|
Kevin Freels |
I'm looking for a specific photo. I don't have the specific date. it could be in a dozen places. narrowing by date has only 10,183 files to sort through to find it.
In the list however, there are images from countless folders that I know it isn't in. It would be great to be able to right click in the results and exclude a folder or tree to narrow things down.
Likewise, it would be great to search for instance, only jog files that have a string of 8 numbers as all photos from my phone have the date in the filename. It would also be very nice to be able to simply right click and add a property to the exclusion list. For example, I find in my seach a group of files named "7D_2016..." which were taken on my 7D in 2016 so I can exclude anything with that in the file name. So right-click>exclude>(choice of filename or extenstion)>(choice of entire filename or partial..if partial, redirects to the exclusion dialog with the info up to this point pre-filled and I just have to edit the filename portion)
I have no doubt that either of the two would make this search much easier.
Activity Newest / Oldest
Team UltraSearch
Status changed to: Open
Kevin Freels
Just posted another thing about this. I had the window open several days ago and apparently I forgot to post it. I included an image with it. Sorry for the confusion. Too many things going on at once.
Team UltraSearch
> it would be great to search only jog files that have a string of 8
> numbers as all photos from my phone have the date in the filename
That is already possible using regular expressions, e.g.:
name:~7D_d{8}.jpg
~ starts a regular expression
d means digit
{8} means repeated 8 times
. is an escaped dot
Team UltraSearch
Hi Kevin, thank you very much for your post. Would like to exclude the folder permanently or only for this search?
Kevin Freels
Just for the search in question. And then eliminate additional folders as I go. I'm sure there are ways to do it but I was thinking "easy". Here's another example that may be more useful.
First, I have to say that my file structure is a wreck. Two years ago I had a lot of data in both Google Drive and OneDrive and had begun consolidating. Lightning got through my USP and fried my SSD and one drive in a 3 drive RAID. A lot was copying from Google to OneDrive at the time. I had to put it all back together in a rush and 3 days later I was dealing with a divorce. It's been chaos ever since. lol Getting it all straight is still a work in progress.
Anyways, my Documents folder has 61 folders in it. Half are there because 30 nitwits thought their software was so important that it needed a dedicated folder in my Documents. :-? Within that is a folder of personal pics. That's split into multiple subfolders.
Going back up, there are several other folders and subfolders with photos for various reasons. Going up to the root of onedrive, there are photos in Downloads, and again, folders and subfolders of different types of images. The problem is that when I began digital photography, tagging wasn't a thing. By the time I had software capable of tagging, I didn't bother because the folder structure was too large to ever expect to tag everything.
The Pictures folder is where all of my "real photos" are. I switched from film to a Canon 5D in 2006. I always saved them to an external RAID drive and later, also to the cloud. I have 17 years of photo jobs, weddings, experiments, and just plain fun. All sorted by months because that's all the early systems could do. That's 204 folders. Then each month broken down by job. If I shot three weddings, 14 senior sets, 4 marching band shows, 6 personal events, and 2 experiments, that's 26 subfolders...in folder 1.
Following the crash two years ago I decided to keep everything on OneDrive and locally just have it available if needed. The files were smaller back in the day but i shot a lot more with the camera since phones were lousy. As time went on, I moved into telecom instead of photography as a career, phone cameras improved, and the usage shifted. Altogther there are 1962 folders with the Canon Monthly folder structure....roughly 275,000 photos.
Phone backups also go to this folder as well but that folder is "Samsung". It's folders have a different structure and contain just over 128,000 images over the last 15 years. Well over 400,000 files just between the phone and my DSLR. The phone stuff is a mess because different phones have had different structures to their folders and filenames over the years. Also, I've had phones crash, and on restore they've done weird things to file attributes and other similar issues.
And of course there are photos SENT to me. over the years, photo scans from the film days, and well, you get the picture. It's totally insane. It has to be well over a half-million and probably around 5000 folders. I've been slowly reorganizing it, trying to eliminate duplicates, screenshots, and other crap, but it's incredibly slow.
________________________________
Meanwhile, I currently run a small wireless ISP. I started 7 years ago and I've used screencaps of bandwidth tests, pics of checks for deposits, training, marketing, all the content on the website, troubleshooting, mapping, inventory records...all in OneDrive for Business. ... Another 500k images...
And there are plenty of photos in the wrong OneDrive accounts. lol
And that's what led to this idea.
I'm looking for a screencap of an SMS conversation with my sister that happend in 2016-2017...about an 18 month window. I do know it was a screencap from my phone but I don't know if it is in one of the many phone pics folders, or if I moved it to a folder in my documents, or if I renamed it, or if I put it in a family folder... No clue. I don't even know if it's a png or jpg. It's not a RAW so that's good.
I can't possibly think of all the folders that it might be in and not miss any. Going 2-3 levels deep and manually selecting certain subdirectories in each possible root folder would take a very long time.
BUT, that's where the benefit would shine.
I could just run the search. It's super fast! And then I can just eliminate folders and paths as I see all that's in them. The detalis I'm not so clear on. Would need to sit down and think it through. But that's really what I'm after.
There was a detail that I was going to mention but I guess it ran off. I'm sure it will be back. When it does, I'll shoot it over to you.
Thanks for taking the time to investigate this possibility even if it doesn't pan out. Have a great day!
Team UltraSearch
Status changed to: Under review