When using the "Add scan" button on the top left, there is now a new option "S3 compatible" on the S3 page, which allow you to additionally specify an endpoint.
Since Amazon deprecated the path style addressing model in 2020, we decided to support only the virtual host style in the first step. We'll see what other uses give as feedback.
Do you plan to stick with the path style addressing model in the future?
Im not in control over the on-prem setup, but have asked the admin if they could consider supporting virtual host style.
Even if Amazon depricated in 2020 (but are still supporting it for old setups), I suspect many are still using path style, since its simpler to setup.
It would have been nice to have the option.
I hope you will contemplate as soon as possible the possibility of including in TreeSize Professional the access to S3 compatible. We have a NetApp StorageGrid S3 and it would be very helpful if Treesize could give us information. For us it is essential.
We had some technical issues and I'm sorry to say that this feature won't make it in V9.2. But we will provide a prerelease with this feature included here shortly.
Good morning.
We have a NetApp StorageGrid (S3). It would be very interesting to be able to use treesize with the tenants of this S3.
Is this possible?
Strongly support. Having AWS and Azure scanning has basically doubled the value of TSP to me, which, admittedly was a hard thing to do. But adding S3 compatibility opens TSP up to the rest of the Cloud.
BackBlaze, Minio, Wasabi, IDrive e2 and dozens if not hundreds of other services. S3 is the defacto standard for cloud storage on the Internet used or supported by almost everyone not named MS or Google. It should be fairly simple, rather than using the AWS endpoint locaters, just take an endpoint given to you by the user and go to town.
I agree I would also like to see this. example, Backblaze B2 has S3 compatible storage. Applications like MINIO can provide an S3 compatible layer on any server storage too.
Activity Newest / Oldest
Team TreeSize
The feature is now finally released. For the support of path style, I opened a new feature request hat is now open for voting: jam-software.upvoty.com/b/treesize/support-path-style-for-aws-s3-and-compatible-object-store
Team TreeSize
Status changed to: Released
Team TreeSize
We now have a beta version ready that comes with support for S3 compatible object store. All customers with active maintenance can simply install it over their existing version. Here is the download link:
jamsoftwaregmbh.sharepoint.com/:u:/t/Fileshare/EYLjacKHD4RIkHyqDOrxagMBuksWafJfyai9yz-FuHQcfQ?e=x3j08f
When using the "Add scan" button on the top left, there is now a new option "S3 compatible" on the S3 page, which allow you to additionally specify an endpoint.
Team TreeSize
Did anyone of the voters have the chance to test scanning S3 compatible object store? We appreciate any kind of feedback, positive or negative.
Haagen Waade
I did try it now, but I encountered an issue, since our on-prem s3 is not configured with virtual host but uses path style adressing model, ref:
stackoverflow.com/questions/47755043/what-is-difference-between-aws-s3-virtual-hosted-style-url-v-s-path-style-url
And seems the beta take for granted the use of virtual host style since its adding the bucket name in front of the endpoint
Team TreeSize
Since Amazon deprecated the path style addressing model in 2020, we decided to support only the virtual host style in the first step. We'll see what other uses give as feedback.
Do you plan to stick with the path style addressing model in the future?
Haagen Waade
Im not in control over the on-prem setup, but have asked the admin if they could consider supporting virtual host style.
Even if Amazon depricated in 2020 (but are still supporting it for old setups), I suspect many are still using path style, since its simpler to setup.
It would have been nice to have the option.
Juampa
I hope you will contemplate as soon as possible the possibility of including in TreeSize Professional the access to S3 compatible. We have a NetApp StorageGrid S3 and it would be very helpful if Treesize could give us information. For us it is essential.
Team TreeSize
Merged with: S3 Netapp StorageGrid support
Juampa
Good;
Perfect, as soon as you have it available, let us know and we will make testers.
Team UltraSearch
We had some technical issues and I'm sorry to say that this feature won't make it in V9.2. But we will provide a prerelease with this feature included here shortly.
Juampa
Good;
Perfect, as soon as you have it available, let us know and we will make testers.
Juampa
Good morning.
Can you tell me when the 9.2 and especially if it is contemplated to support the NetApp S3 (StorageGrid).
Juan Pablo Moreno
Add NetApp StorageGrid
Juampa
Good morning.
We have a NetApp StorageGrid (S3). It would be very interesting to be able to use treesize with the tenants of this S3.
Is this possible?
Team SpaceObServer
Merged with: Treesize of Netapp StorageGrid
Team TreeSize
Status changed to: In progress
Team TreeSize
Status changed to: Planned
Jerry Langland
Strongly support. Having AWS and Azure scanning has basically doubled the value of TSP to me, which, admittedly was a hard thing to do. But adding S3 compatibility opens TSP up to the rest of the Cloud.
BackBlaze, Minio, Wasabi, IDrive e2 and dozens if not hundreds of other services. S3 is the defacto standard for cloud storage on the Internet used or supported by almost everyone not named MS or Google. It should be fairly simple, rather than using the AWS endpoint locaters, just take an endpoint given to you by the user and go to town.
Haagen Waade
Agree too! Should not be too much change than add the possibility to configure your own endpoint? 3 years without much activity doesnt look good :(
Scott
totally agree! I'd absolutely love it if TreeSize could support these endpoints. Ceph-S3 is another example.
I agree I would also like to see this. example, Backblaze B2 has S3 compatible storage. Applications like MINIO can provide an S3 compatible layer on any server storage too.